In the 2003 edition of the "Food Hygiene Testing Methodology" standard series, a significant update was introduced—many testing procedures, especially those involving pesticide analysis, now rely heavily on solid-phase extraction (SPE) technology. This shift is detailed in Table 1. In this article, we will explore the principles, applications, and common misunderstandings surrounding SPE.
Solid-phase extraction (SPE) was first developed in the 1970s and has since become a widely used technique in sample preparation due to its efficiency, reliability, and low reagent consumption. It has largely replaced traditional liquid-liquid extraction in many fields. However, some older textbooks mistakenly associate SPE with liquid chromatography, which can lead to improper usage. While SPE shares some similarities with chromatography, it should be viewed more as an extractant rather than a chromatographic column. The main goal of SPE is to extract target compounds, not to separate them like in chromatography.
The primary roles of SPE in sample processing are purification and concentration, and these two functions can occur simultaneously. Compared to liquid-liquid extraction, SPE offers several advantages, such as reduced solvent use and convenience. However, one drawback is the difficulty in achieving consistent results between batches. This is because even if the solid phase material is pure, variations in particle size, shape, and other physical properties can affect performance, making reproducibility challenging.
Although theoretically, SPE represents a major advancement in pre-treatment for chromatographic analysis, offering minimal solvent use, batch processing capabilities, and effective enrichment and decontamination, its practical application in China remains limited despite years of promotion. This is partly due to user expectations and the inherent limitations of the technique. Some suppliers may downplay these limitations for economic reasons. SPE can serve as a useful supplement to traditional methods, but users must understand its strengths and weaknesses and apply it appropriately.
In terms of application, SPE is particularly beneficial in certain scenarios:
1. **Pretreatment of Organic Matter in Water**
Traditional methods often involve shaking water samples with immiscible organic solvents, which lacks precision and repeatability. SPE, on the other hand, allows for controlled and repeatable extraction. It also enables on-site processing, which is crucial for preserving the integrity of volatile or unstable organic compounds. By performing SPE at the sampling location, the sample can be transported in a stable form, ensuring more accurate laboratory results.
2. **Extraction of Pharmaceutical Components from Biological Samples**
SPE has proven highly effective in analyzing blood and urine samples in clinical settings. Its ability to adsorb drug components makes it ideal for large-scale, batch processing after method validation.
3. **Immunoaffinity Solid-Phase Extraction**
While traditional SPE can achieve partial selectivity, combining it with immunoaffinity techniques allows for highly specific extraction. This approach leverages biological recognition to enhance selectivity, approaching near-theoretical perfection in target compound recovery.
Overall, while SPE has not fully replaced traditional methods yet, its potential for improving accuracy, reducing solvent use, and enabling on-site processing makes it a promising tool for future developments in analytical chemistry.
Some antioxidant ingredients are also important components of anti-aging skin care products, which can neutralize free radicals and reduce damage to the skin, thus delaying the aging process of the skin.
Natural Lycopene Colorant, Food Additive Natural Vitamin E,Lycopene From Blakeslea Trispora,Lycopene As Antioxidant
Xi'an Hersoncare Bio-Tech Co., Ltd , https://www.hersoncarebio.com